Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics86% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 04 '19 at 14:16
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 138
2-Core 271
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 865
86% 700 Pts
64-Core 1,116
69% 1,116 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1755 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 114
Parallax 102
90% 109 fps
MRender 95.1
Gravity 100
Splatting 90.8
78% 95.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 894 845 840 818 805 779 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2,560
Write 1,082
Mixed 844
SusWrite 830
292% 1,329 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 67
236% 87.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,040
DQ Write 824
DQ Mixed 909
686% 924 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 268%
Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Evo 4TB-$470
1.5TB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 459 459 461 465 467 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 480
Mixed 371
SusWrite 462
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 99.1
4K Mixed 57.6
191% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
216GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 455 455 457 461 465 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 484
Mixed 352
SusWrite 458
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 41.8
151% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 189
187% 299 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 110%
Great: 118%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
870GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 105 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 101
Write 101
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 105
70% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 83%
USB 3.0 Drobo S - Gen 2 17.5TB
13TB free, PID 000a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 47 49 48 49 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 102
Write 77.3
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 50.3
86% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.1
104% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.6% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 22.8
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 23.7
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback