Gigabyte GA-H310 D3 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310 D3 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 04 '19 at 07:53
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Memory 78.2 1-Core 134 2-Core 258 86% 157 Pts	4-Core 511 8-Core 506 68% 509 Pts	64-Core 515 32% 515 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8509) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.41 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.6% Average	Lighting 58.2 Reflection 65.7 Parallax 63.1 48% 62.3 fps	MRender 69.5 Gravity 56.1 Splatting 53 48% 59.6 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB 26,055 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT24B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 6,542 Write 5,769 Mixed 5,505 1,324% 5,939 MB/s	4K Read 736 4K Write 206 4K Mixed 295 1,602% 412 MB/s	DQ Read 1,700 DQ Write 702 DQ Mixed 404 510% 935 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
OCZ AGILITY4 128GB 1,160 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 111GB free Firmware: 1.5.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 270 265 279 268 268 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Read 303 Write 289 Mixed 205 SusWrite 272 60% 267 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 95.1 4K Mixed 25.8 108% 45.6 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 269 DQ Mixed 57.1 83% 150 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 81%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$47 20,548 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 274GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 138 138 138 139 136 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Read 163 Write 138 Mixed 91.3 SusWrite 138 97% 133 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
R748G2606U2S-U 8001 R748G2606U2S 16GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	81.8% Excellent	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 32.4 MC Mixed 25.3 84% 29.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 31.5 SC Mixed 24.3 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 83.9 48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310 D3 2.0 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310 D3 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	28x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	7x
Core i5-9600KFIntel $180Bench 93%, 65,122 samples	5x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	8x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	4x

SSD
WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GBWDCBench 87%, 12,305 samples	4x
TS128GMTE110S 128GBTranscendBench 125%, 4,843 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	5x
Predator 2666 C13 2x8GBHyperX $137Bench 82%, 7,627 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $501

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16