PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7A32 |
Motherboard | MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) (all builds) |
Memory | 9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170920 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Dec 04 '19 at 07:46 |
Run Duration | 177 Seconds |
Run User | ZAF-User |
Background CPU | 40% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
62.7%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 436.48
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.5%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 238 218 206 208 205 MB/s
|
67.4%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
20GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 163 182 148 88 128 MB/s
|
95.3%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate ST8000VX0002-1Z6 8TB
932GB free
Firmware: AV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 81 84 91 78 90 MB/s
|
61.6%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
174GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 149 154 148 158 160 MB/s
|
70.1%
Very good
|
|||
WD Elements 2TB
479GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 34 33 34 33 MB/s
|
15.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSC.16FAD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 250x |
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 225x |
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples | 180x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 174x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 121x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 115x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 79% - Very good | Total price: $899 |