Asus VivoBook S15 X510UF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive99.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC). CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook S15 X510UF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X510UF
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '19 at 05:04
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 18%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.7% Very good
1-Core 119
2-Core 237
84% 178 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 569
65% 495 Pts
64-Core 536
36% 536 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia MX130
Asus(1043 1131) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4141
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 31.9
Reflection 23.9
Parallax 29.4
8% 28.4 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 38.5
Splatting 19.9
10% 28.2 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 11%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 404 400 411 408 406 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 430
Write 341
Mixed 256
SusWrite 391
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 39.2
139% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 222
200% 306 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 116%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
268GB free
Firmware: SBFA13.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 281 185 109 111 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 325
Write 151
Mixed 229
SusWrite 183
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 9.6
56% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 15.1
DQ Mixed 26
33% 63 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 99%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB
374GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 21 22 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.9% Very poor
Read 38.1
Write 39.6
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 21.6
8% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 13.2
45% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 23.3
DQ Write 22.3
DQ Mixed 22.8
17% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 78%
Lacie P9227 Slim 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1153
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 34.4
Write 35.3
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 21.1
23% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
144% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 859B CT8G4SFD824A.M16FF 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.3% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 22.7
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 24.3
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 78%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical VivoBook S15 X510UF Builds (Compare 1,126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Asus VivoBook S15 X510UF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $224
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback