| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Asus Z9PE-D8 WS (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS |
| Memory | 35.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140210 |
| Uptime | 2 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 04 '19 at 01:23 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
66.2%
Good
|
57% 98.7 Pts
|
58% 495 Pts
|
130% 2,098 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
100%
Outstanding
|
101% 120 fps
|
98% 125 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 136 33 31 32 26 MB/s
|
84.5%
Excellent
|
76% 341 MB/s
|
139% 46.9 MB/s
|
207% 312 MB/s
|
|
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
17GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 134 133 127 108 124 MB/s
|
63.2%
Good
|
68% 93.1 MB/s
|
214% 1.57 MB/s
| |
|
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 25 25 MB/s
|
15%
Very poor
|
33% 25.1 MB/s
|
77% 0.9 MB/s
| |
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 221 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples | 19x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 16x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 14x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 14x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $383 |