Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2637M 599 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Memory 84.1 1-Core 72.2 2-Core 116 58% 90.6 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 165 22% 165 Pts	64-Core 169 10% 169 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 04C8) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3347 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.89% Terrible	Lighting 2.03 Reflection 4.62 Parallax 1.5 2% 2.72 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 1.23 Splatting 3.96 2% 2.71 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.89% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160 11,787 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: R201 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 307 Write 112 Mixed 136 40% 185 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 42.8 4K Mixed 24.1 83% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 133 101% 138 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 CMSO4GX3M1A1333C9 8GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.5 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 15.5 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 73.3 54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	38x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	21x

SSD
PM830 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 63%, 9,379 samples	7x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	5x
M4 256GBCrucial $218Bench 61%, 17,938 samples	3x

RAM
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	6x
HMT41GS6MFR8C-H9 2x8GBHynixBench 43%, 63 samples	5x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16