Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 03 '19 at 22:31
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-2600K-$145
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
62.3% Good
1-Core 91.8
2-Core 185
65% 138 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 472
54% 410 Pts
64-Core 476
32% 476 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
EVGA(3842 2673) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Lighting 95.1
Reflection 84.7
Parallax 144
25% 108 fps
MRender 97.1
Gravity 112
Splatting 76.7
32% 95.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 37%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$150
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 306
Write 251
Mixed 254
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 43.8
145% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 159
120% 161 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 116%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$51
34GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 62 65 62 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 50
Write 53.2
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 60.6
40% 53.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$19
68GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 72 73 73 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 87.2
Write 81.2
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 71.8
56% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 71%
WD Elements 1TB
186GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 72.2
Write 74.7
Mixed 26
70% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 44%
WD Elements 25A2 1.5TB
906GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 99 99 99 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 91.7
Write 92.2
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 98.8
114% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 62%
WD My Book 111D 1TB
721GB free, PID 111d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 26 26 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 24.7
Mixed 24
SusWrite 25.3
34% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBXL 04CD F3-10666CL9-4GBXL 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
49% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49%
Great: 58%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 3,701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $930
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $359Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback