Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 03 '19 at 22:31
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 163
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 472
51% 407 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
EVGA(3842 2673) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.7% Poor
Lighting 31.7
Reflection 32.6
Parallax 44.9
26% 36.4 fps
MRender 46.2
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 33.3
31% 39 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 306
Write 251
Mixed 254
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 43.8
145% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 159
120% 161 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
34GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 62 65 62 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 50
Write 53.2
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 60.6
40% 53.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
68GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 72 73 73 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 87.2
Write 81.2
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 71.8
56% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 70%
WD Elements 1TB
186GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 72.2
Write 74.7
Mixed 26
70% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 43%
WD Elements 25A2 1.5TB
906GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 99 99 99 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 91.7
Write 92.2
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 98.8
114% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 65%
WD My Book 111D 1TB
721GB free, PID 111d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 26 26 26 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 24.7
Mixed 24
SusWrite 25.3
34% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBXL 04CD F3-10666CL9-4GBXL 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $849
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback