Asus AM1M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 18%
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus AM1M-A  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140428
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 03 '19 at 22:31
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Sempron 3850 APU R3
FS1b , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
1-Core 21.6
2-Core 41.8
15% 31.7 Pts
4-Core 71.8
8-Core 82.4
10% 77.1 Pts
64-Core 82.9
6% 82.9 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 17%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD HD 8280
Asus(1043 8623) 512MB
CLim: 450 MHz, MLim: 667 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
1.13% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 4.3
0% 4.57 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 6.4
1% 5.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.13%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$18
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 56 54 58 58 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 101
Write 97.2
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 59.1
59% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF CT25664BA160B.C8FE 6GB
667, 800 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 6.5
17% 5.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6.4
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 213
19% 213 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical AM1M-A Builds (Compare 725 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 25%
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus AM1M-A - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $210
The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $359Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback