Performance Results


Gaming 103% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 102% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190902
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '19 at 22:12
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900KS 12,840 User benchmarks, average bench 99% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Memory 88.4 1-Core 153 2-Core 302 98% 181 Pts	4-Core 552 8-Core 948 91% 750 Pts	64-Core 1,462 90% 1,462 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466 261,508 User benchmarks, average bench 131% Asus(1043 8712) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	107% Outstanding	Lighting 139 Reflection 139 Parallax 128 114% 135 fps	MRender 159 Gravity 121 Splatting 94.1 98% 124 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 139%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB 32,020 User benchmarks, average bench 230% 716GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM22.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1299 839 889 897 885 902 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	212% Outstanding	Read 1,343 Write 2,009 Mixed 1,539 SusWrite 952 331% 1,461 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 95.5 4K Mixed 54.2 168% 60.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,148 DQ Write 998 DQ Mixed 1,281 903% 1,142 MB/s
Poor: 150% ↑ This bench: 212% Great: 298%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 458GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 402 426 431 433 432 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 448 Write 437 Mixed 355 SusWrite 420 94% 415 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 67.5 4K Mixed 44.5 142% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 353 266% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 113 114 116 114 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Read 141 Write 137 Mixed 87.5 SusWrite 115 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB 92,358 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	67.3% Good	MC Read 23.1 MC Write 26.2 MC Mixed 22.4 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 22.2 SC Mixed 20.3 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 150%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 139%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,503x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,315x
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	1,121x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,345x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	1,040x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	802x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	738x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	583x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	522x

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,095

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16