| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | EVGA 132-CK-NF79 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | Χρώματα 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20080910 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 03 '19 at 20:53 |
| Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
| Run User | GRC-User |
| Background CPU | 9% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450-$110
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
39.3%
Below average
|
34% 54.9 Pts
|
19% 143 Pts
|
8% 124 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Asus(1043 054F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1187 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.11.3
|
22.3%
Poor
|
21% 29.8 fps
|
24% 29 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 103 104 105 100 MB/s
|
33.6%
Below average
|
23% 103 MB/s
|
67% 21.5 MB/s
|
32% 43.8 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 186 185 193 192 183 MB/s
|
90.9%
Outstanding
|
94% 129 MB/s
|
118% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
|
12.3%
Very poor
|
12% 4.17 GB/s
|
5% 1.83 GB/s
|
27% 147 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 132-CK-NF79 Builds (Compare 44 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: EVGA 132-CK-NF79
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Extreme X9770IntelBench 57%, 522 samples | 13x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 7x |
| Core2 Quad Q9450Intel $110Bench 49%, 5,335 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 8x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 4x |
| GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $228 |