Lenovo 80Q5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemLenovo 80Q5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G70-35
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '16 at 00:35
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A4-6210 APU R3 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
21.2% Poor
1-Core 30.8
2-Core 61.5
22% 46.2 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 123
17% 123 Pts
64-Core 125
8% 125 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 21%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3810) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.9.2
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
1.57% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 9.1
2% 9.37 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 8.1
2% 6.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.57%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC400 128GB-$97
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.W Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 495
Write 331
Mixed 374
89% 400 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 11.1
64% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 74.3
DQ Write 65.7
DQ Mixed 11.4
25% 50.4 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905428-435.A00LF Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 12GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 6.7
17% 6.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 57%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 80Q5 Builds (Compare 174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80Q5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $49
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $146Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback