Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 03 '19 at 20:31
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 17%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 84
2-Core 163
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 359
38% 299 Pts
64-Core 404
27% 404 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2001) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
5.82% Terrible
Lighting 7.17
Reflection 59.3
Parallax 7.38
6% 24.6 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 6.47
Splatting 13
6% 10.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.82%
Great: 6%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E128 128GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C270902
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 82 72 68 71 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 388
Write 137
Mixed 95.9
SusWrite 73.8
38% 174 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 15.4
61% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 112
95% 139 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 93%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
121GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 105 103 104 104 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 65.3
Write 89.8
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 103
59% 80 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.5
172% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
74% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 22.4
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 22.9
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 5,969 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $239Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $299Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback