Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics81.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '19 at 17:45
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 89.8
1-Core 146
2-Core 285
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 820
86% 688 Pts
64-Core 1,052
65% 1,052 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.5% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 111
Parallax 95
82% 102 fps
MRender 96
Gravity 95.5
Splatting 99.4
80% 97 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 534 316 315 313 298 285 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 2,475
Write 1,459
Mixed 1,280
SusWrite 343
307% 1,389 MB/s
4K Read 64.9
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 86.7
298% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 978
DQ Write 1058
DQ Mixed 1,011
763% 1,016 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 258%
Great: 280%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
144GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 796 671 674 675 672 671 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 2,541
Write 2,374
Mixed 1,714
SusWrite 693
409% 1,831 MB/s
4K Read 67
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 89.4
303% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 63
DQ Write 937
DQ Mixed 85.2
190% 362 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 261%
Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 201 201 203 203 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 161
Mixed 89.3
SusWrite 202
119% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 37.6
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 37.7
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback