Gigabyte GA-P75-D3

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

13 months ago, 13 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P75-D3 (all builds)
Memory	0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131104
Uptime	14.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '19 at 12:42
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	ISL-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 218,092 User benchmarks, average bench 74% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Memory 84.3 1-Core 88.7 2-Core 141 66% 105 Pts	4-Core 284 8-Core 301 40% 293 Pts	64-Core 346 23% 346 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$340 642,081 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.41 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.8% Average	Lighting 54.8 Reflection 58 Parallax 48.8 44% 53.9 fps	MRender 57.7 Gravity 49.6 Splatting 43.9 41% 50.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$70 768,156 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 55 51 46 50 47 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.3% Below average	Read 283 Write 67.2 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 51.1 26% 119 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 41.8 4K Mixed 17.8 70% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 32 DQ Write 76 DQ Mixed 30.3 30% 46.1 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30 1,227,452 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 81GB free Firmware: CC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 85 92 77 108 113 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 126 Write 98.5 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 91.4 64% 88 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 991995 (996995) 2x4GB 577 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 12.6 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 73 55% 73 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P75-D3 Builds (Compare 639 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P75-D3

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 74%, 218,092 samples	145x
Core i5-3470Intel $77Bench 71%, 151,360 samples	71x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 73%, 75,017 samples	59x

GPU
RX 580AMD $218Bench 55%, 649,191 samples	55x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 31%, 695,028 samples	45x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 46,386 samples	28x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 67%, 266,434 samples	18x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $66Bench 55%, 257,819 samples	13x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $40Bench 103%, 208,635 samples	13x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 55%, 64,502 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 50%, 60,144 samples	7x
9905403-442.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,510 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $543

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $200	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16