Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '19 at 07:39
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Memory 85.1 1-Core 124 2-Core 248 85% 152 Pts	4-Core 485 8-Core 883 82% 684 Pts	64-Core 1,299 80% 1,299 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6696) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.41 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.1% Below average	Lighting 39.8 Reflection 45.8 Parallax 37.2 32% 40.9 fps	MRender 56.5 Gravity 39.7 Splatting 51.6 40% 49.3 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 368GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 322 322 323 321 311 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 485 Mixed 461 SusWrite 338 101% 447 MB/s	4K Read 42.6 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 58.8 198% 70.3 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 367 276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 129%
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152 5,920 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 122GB free Firmware: SAFM12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 215 173 272 288 281 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 484 Mixed 371 SusWrite 249 90% 402 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 85.7 4K Mixed 38.9 140% 51.5 MB/s	DQ Read 344 DQ Write 360 DQ Mixed 201 193% 302 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 99%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 755GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 149 151 149 151 152 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 206 Write 151 Mixed 116 SusWrite 151 115% 156 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.2 247% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$60 17,279 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 42.9 MC Write 38.3 MC Mixed 32.7 108% 38 GB/s	SC Read 26.9 SC Write 38.2 SC Mixed 28.6 89% 31.2 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 111%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	177x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	202x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	142x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,013

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16