Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics80.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '19 at 07:31
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-6700K-$298
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
1-Core 130
2-Core 259
91% 194 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 681
72% 563 Pts
64-Core 675
45% 675 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$415
Gigabyte(1458 3773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Lighting 321
Reflection 292
Parallax 306
84% 306 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 296
Splatting 228
81% 241 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 86%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,936
Write 1,157
Mixed 523
264% 1,206 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 56.5
217% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,058
DQ Write 733
DQ Mixed 684
568% 825 MB/s
Poor: 134% Great: 235%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$38
380GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 130 131 131 132 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 149
Write 158
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 130
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
234% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 109%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
3TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 158 159 162 161 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 150
Write 158
Mixed 104
SusWrite 160
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 89%
Great: 103%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
3TB free
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 166 165 165 167 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 167
Mixed 109
SusWrite 166
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 26.4
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 30
74% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 52.2
77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 105%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 5,251 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,135
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback