Microelectronics G353

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicroelectronics G353  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock Z390 Pro4
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 03 '19 at 06:58
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$284
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 97.7
1-Core 146
2-Core 290
101% 178 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 1,081
102% 823 Pts
64-Core 1,097
74% 1,097 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$450
Zotac(19DA 1520) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.81
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 377
Reflection 330
Parallax 382
99% 363 fps
MRender 380
Gravity 373
Splatting 237
110% 330 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 118%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0B-00YS70 250GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 217 212 214 221 222 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 448
Write 360
Mixed 306
SusWrite 217
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 28.9
94% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 194
176% 273 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
608GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 149 150 148 149 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 144
Write 142
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 149
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 158
Write 9.8
Mixed 15.8
SusWrite 14.1
36% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 89%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0740
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 92 95 95 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 88.8
Write 91
Mixed 61
SusWrite 94.3
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 0.6
211% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 106%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB
45GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 82 82 84 86 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42% Average
Read 90.5
Write 74.7
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 83
109% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 4.3
274% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 42%
Great: 42%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 32GB
6GB free, PID 00ed
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 13 9.9 7.7 6.2 5.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 79.3
Write 24.8
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 8.7
30% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown NMUD480E86-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 27.8
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 30.6
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 47.2
85% 47.2 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical G353 Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

System: Microelectronics G353

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $734
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $548SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback