Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 03 '19 at 04:59
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$85
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 80.8
1-Core 143
2-Core 286
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 812
82% 667 Pts
64-Core 1,032
64% 1,032 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 138
Parallax 119
105% 129 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 127
Splatting 105
92% 114 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
608GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1426 1503 1506 1569 1558 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 1,439
Write 1,583
Mixed 1,087
SusWrite 1,280
304% 1,348 MB/s
4K Read 57.5
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 78.2
273% 99.3 MB/s
DQ Read 637
DQ Write 902
DQ Mixed 272
345% 604 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 255%
Great: 255%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
521GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1119 1083 1109 1118 1114 1116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,329
Write 1,117
Mixed 947
SusWrite 1,110
253% 1,126 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 79.5
275% 98.7 MB/s
DQ Read 685
DQ Write 691
DQ Mixed 273
319% 549 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 237%
Great: 295%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
106GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 280 280 281 280 280 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 492
Mixed 408
SusWrite 294
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 56.3
196% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 220
207% 321 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 115%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
931GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 168 168 169 169 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 169
Mixed 120
SusWrite 168
121% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
246% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 140 140 140 140 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 134
Write 119
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 139
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 40.2
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 37.4
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,014
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback