Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	363% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W-2123 2,702 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 78.8 1-Core 104 2-Core 208 73% 130 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 561 56% 459 Pts	64-Core 593 37% 593 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 76%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDPED1D480GAH 480GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 437% 365GB free (System drive) Firmware: E201HPS2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1628 1640 1624 1637 1656 1642 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	363% Outstanding	Read 2,047 Write 1,704 Mixed 1,832 SusWrite 1,638 406% 1,805 MB/s	4K Read 219 4K Write 92 4K Mixed 118 532% 143 MB/s	DQ Read 800 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 320 280% 436 MB/s
Poor: 309% ↑ This bench: 363% Great: 575%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2K40BB2-CTD 2x16GB 231 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 27.5 MC Mixed 16.7 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 9.3 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 82.7 48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 70%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	367x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	345x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	327x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 2,013 samples	271x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	218x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	199x

RAM
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 370 samples	90x
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 410 samples	87x
M393A2K40CB2-CVF 2x16GBSamsungBench 57%, 150 samples	65x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16