Hp-pavilion KT608AAR-ABA d5000t

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion KT608AAR-ABA d5000t  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON Burbank
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '19 at 00:52
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450-$58
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 45
2-Core 90.3
43% 66.6 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 160
21% 154 Pts
64-Core 172
12% 172 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
EVGA(3842 1561) 1GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 18.4
16% 20.8 fps
MRender 27.7
Gravity 21
Splatting 22
18% 23.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17%
Great: 19%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$40
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 187 217 220 226 222 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.2% Above average
Read 241
Write 227
Mixed 193
SusWrite 212
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 23.7
78% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 168
132% 181 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 129%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
406GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 39 39 39 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 11.3
Write 40.3
Mixed 34
SusWrite 38.8
23% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
52% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 52%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$32
697GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 35 36 38 36 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 43.7
Write 36
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 36.8
25% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
14% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 3.7
13% 4.47 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i3-10100F $120Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback