Lenovo 81NC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemLenovo 81NC  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190222
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 02 '19 at 19:56
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
47.7% Average
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 136
48% 102 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 401
43% 337 Pts
64-Core 502
34% 502 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3802) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver:
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
2.17% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 11.4
2% 9.07 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 8
2% 7.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.17%
Great: 13%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 280 276 288 290 285 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 611
Write 703
Mixed 629
SusWrite 309
127% 563 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 18.1
66% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 566
DQ Write 470
DQ Mixed 501
380% 512 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.6% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 12.9
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 11.1
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 215
19% 215 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 71%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 81NC Builds (Compare 605 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 17%
Desktop 51%
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 81NC

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $154Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $384Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback