Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3632QM 24,912 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 76 1-Core 86.7 2-Core 169 64% 111 Pts	4-Core 307 8-Core 387 44% 347 Pts	64-Core 409 25% 409 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 21F3) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.88% Terrible	Lighting 4.27 Reflection 5.62 Parallax 2.91 4% 4.26 fps	MRender 5.76 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 8.09 5% 5.41 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.88% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 292 296 295 294 295 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Read 422 Write 410 Mixed 343 SusWrite 309 84% 371 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 42.1 4K Mixed 20.7 88% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 360 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CK0 2x8GB 1,654 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	52.7% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 17.1 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 15.5 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 88.4 45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-3320MIntel $199Bench 48%, 30,496 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	2x

SSD
THNSNF128GCSS 128GBToshibaBench 68%, 2,061 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
HMT451S6AFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 49%, 1,067 samples	1x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	1x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $199

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16