Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive319% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '19 at 16:51
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 96.9
1-Core 159
2-Core 318
104% 191 Pts
4-Core 635
8-Core 1,213
110% 924 Pts
64-Core 1,621
100% 1,621 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 108%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.3
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Lighting 73.6
Reflection 74
Parallax 103
60% 83.6 fps
MRender 73.1
Gravity 74.3
Splatting 58.6
55% 68.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2305 813 814 814 817 817 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 2,641
Write 2,467
Mixed 1884
SusWrite 1,063
451% 2,014 MB/s
4K Read 67.9
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 88.4
294% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,393
DQ Write 1,182
DQ Mixed 1,271
957% 1,282 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 319%
Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
16GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 505
Write 454
Mixed 417
102% 459 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 64.1
222% 80.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 354
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
760GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1440 1433 1438 1444 1561 1562 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 1,456
Write 1,553
Mixed 1087
SusWrite 1,480
314% 1,394 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 73.7
263% 95 MB/s
DQ Read 618
DQ Write 916
DQ Mixed 270
344% 601 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 264%
Great: 255%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
216GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 69 70 70 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 81.2
Write 79.2
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 70.2
52% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 62%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
931GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 109 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 105
Write 111
Mixed 59
SusWrite 109
70% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 43.7
MC Mixed 32.6
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 50.7
SC Mixed 33.3
103% 35.9 GB/s
Latency 50.7
79% 50.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 111%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $396

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,342
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback