Razer Blade Pro 17 (2019)

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	7.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Razer Blade Pro 17 (2019) (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA720
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190619
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '19 at 13:14
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	5%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Memory 93.4 1-Core 114 2-Core 247 85% 151 Pts	4-Core 462 8-Core 620 69% 541 Pts	64-Core 758 47% 758 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 3000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.39% Terrible	Lighting 7.2 Reflection 117 Parallax 8.19 6% 44.2 fps	MRender 12.6 Gravity 7.4 Splatting 16.4 10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.39% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D512 512GB 4,424 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 408GB free (System drive) Firmware: C490903 SusWrite @10s intervals: 597 431 401 423 421 438 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	186% Outstanding	Read 1555 Write 1,907 Mixed 1,330 SusWrite 452 294% 1,311 MB/s	4K Read 46 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 63.8 208% 72 MB/s	DQ Read 1,262 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 159 254% 521 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 186% Great: 228%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 931GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 194 194 190 192 192 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 492 Write 189 Mixed 262 SusWrite 194 63% 284 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 4 39% 9.3 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	MC Read 31.3 MC Write 32.1 MC Mixed 22.8 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 34.8 SC Mixed 24.7 72% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Pro 17 (2019) Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Pro 17 (2019)

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	171x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	74x
RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 90%, 7,789 samples	44x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	30x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	47x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	40x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	14x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	61x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	33x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 76%, 20,226 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16