Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	74.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '19 at 09:47
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	Memory 97.2 1-Core 139 2-Core 272 95% 169 Pts	4-Core 532 8-Core 525 71% 529 Pts	64-Core 506 31% 506 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 873A) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Lighting 93.6 Reflection 85.5 Parallax 88.2 76% 89.1 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 79.8 Splatting 73.4 72% 91.1 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 256GB 12,312 User benchmarks, average bench 215% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: SS0328D SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 257 273 268 267 266 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	267% Outstanding	Read 2,720 Write 1,142 Mixed 137 SusWrite 287 232% 1,071 MB/s	4K Read 71.3 4K Write 202 4K Mixed 95.9 338% 123 MB/s	DQ Read 813 DQ Write 814 DQ Mixed 234 336% 621 MB/s
Poor: 141% ↑ This bench: 267% Great: 277%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 609GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 136 136 138 135 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	77% Very good	Read 132 Write 119 Mixed 84.7 SusWrite 136 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot 3600 C17 Series 2x8GB 2,105 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3553 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	MC Read 40.9 MC Write 47.9 MC Mixed 33.3 116% 40.7 GB/s	SC Read 21.9 SC Write 47.7 SC Mixed 33.8 98% 34.5 GB/s	Latency 49.4 81% 49.4 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	476x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	78x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	76x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	90x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	84x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	25x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	21x
Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $161Bench 85%, 35,811 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $910

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16