Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	95.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190912
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '19 at 22:27
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	63%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	67.9% Good	Memory 67.5 1-Core 101 2-Core 206 69% 125 Pts	4-Core 368 8-Core 618 60% 493 Pts	64-Core 1,082 67% 1,082 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6593) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.12 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	95.5% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 138 Parallax 122 102% 129 fps	MRender 89.4 Gravity 124 Splatting 90.2 82% 101 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 111 73 68 80 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 332 Write 361 Mixed 259 SusWrite 118 60% 267 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 58.9 4K Mixed 34.4 107% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 359 270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 134%
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 1TB-$102 9,497 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 561GB free Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 360 391 398 400 398 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Read 401 Write 384 Mixed 309 SusWrite 379 83% 368 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 54.8 4K Mixed 24.2 94% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 261 199% 269 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 120%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 66GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 111 110 110 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	66% Good	Read 119 Write 122 Mixed 88.5 SusWrite 110 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 213% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 31GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 73 59 70 80 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	53% Above average	Read 114 Write 111 Mixed 76.3 SusWrite 69.7 68% 92.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 109%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 392GB free Firmware: 2AR10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 99 101 101 101 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	56% Above average	Read 98.7 Write 42.8 Mixed 40 SusWrite 96.3 51% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB 8,888 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	61.4% Good	MC Read 24.4 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 23.1 64% 22.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 16.7 48% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)