Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120329
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateDec 01 '19 at 18:29
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Memory 53.6
1-Core 37.8
2-Core 64.3
34% 51.9 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 121
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 120
8% 120 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0B3) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.06% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 3.08
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.31 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 4.26
2% 2.92 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.06%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 96 49 136 55 102 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.6% Below average
Read 190
Write 87.3
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 92.5
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 16.5
53% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 80.2
73% 110 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 85%
Sandisk iSSD P4 8GB
7GB free
Firmware: SSD 9.14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 131
Write 25.8
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 25.4
11% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 3.9
19% 5.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 15%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 2GB
2GB free, PID 0727
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 10 10 10 9.8 10 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
5.64% Terrible
Read 17
Write 8.2
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 10
13% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
18% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.64%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-DJ-F 859B CT51264BF160BJ.M8F 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.9% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.4
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback