PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B (all builds) |
Motherboard | SAMSUNG 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B |
Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20120329 |
Uptime | 6.9 Days |
Run Date | Dec 01 '19 at 18:29 |
Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
Run User | EST-User |
Background CPU | 25% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
|
37.8%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0B3) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
|
2.06%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 96 49 136 55 102 MB/s
|
35.6%
Below average
|
|||
Sandisk iSSD P4 8GB
7GB free
Firmware: SSD 9.14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 26 26 26 MB/s
|
12.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 2GB
2GB free, PID 0727
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 10 10 10 9.8 10 MB/s
|
5.64%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-DJ-F 859B CT51264BF160BJ.M8F 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
39.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2675QMIntelBench 58%, 1,033 samples | 51x |
Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples | 27x |
Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 58x |
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 27x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |