Asrock X99E-ITX/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X99E-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160803
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '19 at 05:25
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 1,471 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 68.6 1-Core 82.3 2-Core 119 55% 89.9 Pts	4-Core 313 8-Core 441 47% 377 Pts	64-Core 782 48% 782 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.16 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Lighting 22 Reflection 16.2 Parallax 19.3 18% 19.2 fps	MRender 24 Gravity 22.6 Splatting 16.3 17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 27 28 29 30 28 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 692GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 258 236 245 255 261 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Read 444 Write 399 Mixed 381 SusWrite 277 84% 375 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 36.9 121% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 363 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 256 194% 266 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 133%
WD My Book 1140 2TB 10,094 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1TB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 96 95 94 94 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	39.6% Below average	Read 90.4 Write 89 Mixed 51.8 SusWrite 94.2 110% 81.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GB 178 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	44.5% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 17.3 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 10.2 27% 9.57 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99E-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 85%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99E-ITX/ac - $371

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	41x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	39x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	16x
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	13x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	10x

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	9x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $115Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	6x
MZ7LN256HCHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 81%, 7,649 samples	6x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GBG.SKILL $70Bench 72%, 6,515 samples	12x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x16GBCorsairBench 69%, 3,147 samples	9x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $1,569

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16