Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '19 at 23:28
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Memory 83.7
1-Core 155
2-Core 308
98% 182 Pts
4-Core 605
8-Core 1,032
99% 818 Pts
64-Core 1,468
91% 1,468 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6698) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2765 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 197
Parallax 195
140% 188 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 184
Splatting 128
119% 147 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 417 433 458 453 432 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,875
Write 1,745
Mixed 684
SusWrite 437
263% 1,185 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 60.7
215% 83.2 MB/s
DQ Read 898
DQ Write 777
DQ Mixed 786
603% 820 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 205%
Great: 254%
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
112GB free
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 96 94 89 96 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 481
Write 399
Mixed 355
SusWrite 132
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 22.7
117% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 32.8
82% 166 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 71%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
810GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 194 196 194 195 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 139
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 194
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 110%
Great: 113%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$235
5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 151 153 155 155 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 155
Write 156
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 153
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.7
227% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 47 49 50 51 50 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 131
Write 110
Mixed 80.5
131% 107 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.3
135% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE16G4D30AEEA.K16FB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 35.8
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 34.5
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $1,046
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback