Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 135% UFO	Desktop 108% UFO	Workstation 126% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190715
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '19 at 15:25
Run Duration	257 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Memory 97 1-Core 158 2-Core 319 104% 191 Pts	4-Core 614 8-Core 944 96% 779 Pts	64-Core 1283 79% 1283 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3602) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.41 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	126% Outstanding	Lighting 176 Reflection 188 Parallax 172 143% 178 fps	MRender 123 Gravity 175 Splatting 120 113% 139 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 345GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 900 650 650 652 652 646 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	255% Outstanding	Read 2,054 Write 1,774 Mixed 923 SusWrite 692 303% 1,361 MB/s	4K Read 47 4K Write 166 4K Mixed 68.2 247% 93.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,201 DQ Write 1,265 DQ Mixed 892 765% 1,119 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 255% Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 155GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 483 485 491 491 491 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 486 Mixed 378 SusWrite 487 105% 467 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 48.8 180% 67.2 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 351 267% 361 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 101GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 492 491 492 440 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	130% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 467 Mixed 414 SusWrite 419 101% 451 MB/s	4K Read 46.9 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 65.5 219% 77.8 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 362 272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 133%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 81GB free Firmware: DXT0AB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 249 249 250 250 250 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Read 466 Write 255 Mixed 169 SusWrite 249 63% 285 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 99 4K Mixed 26.3 132% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 352 DQ Write 217 DQ Mixed 58.6 104% 209 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 85%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 355GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 492 491 492 492 492 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 490 Mixed 466 SusWrite 492 111% 491 MB/s	4K Read 44.6 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 62.3 212% 76.3 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 361 272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 179 179 181 179 180 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	Read 152 Write 125 Mixed 81 SusWrite 177 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.9 152% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$234 3,507 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	MC Read 36.9 MC Write 38.1 MC Mixed 29.7 100% 34.9 GB/s	SC Read 23.1 SC Write 42.3 SC Mixed 31.3 92% 32.2 GB/s	Latency 50.4 79% 50.4 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,511x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	832x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	573x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	401x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	346x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	338x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	115x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	145x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	90x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	83x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $844

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16