Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '19 at 11:58
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$165
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.3% Very good
1-Core 111
2-Core 207
76% 159 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 716
73% 575 Pts
64-Core 1182
79% 1182 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$428
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Lighting 186
Reflection 171
Parallax 194
49% 184 fps
MRender 154
Gravity 179
Splatting 126
51% 153 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$60
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 286 288 288 285 279 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 472
Mixed 344
SusWrite 290
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 43.7
164% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 103%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$40
377GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 52 71 61 56 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 48.5
Write 40.5
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 63
32% 43.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
47% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 108%
SABRENT 1TB
826GB free
Firmware: RKT303.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1821 931 884 894 869 923 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$23
430GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 124 124 126 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 126
Write 118
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 124
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 71%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 153 155 157 157 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 143
Write 151
Mixed 114
SusWrite 156
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.6
324% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 101%
WD My Book 1230 3TB
1TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 102 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 85
Write 88.7
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 102
118% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 33.3
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 24.3
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 112%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 8,268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $970
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $384Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback