Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 114% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 129% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	25 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190730
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '19 at 03:10
Run Duration	224 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	95.1% Outstanding	Memory 82.8 1-Core 148 2-Core 300 95% 177 Pts	4-Core 575 8-Core 1,142 101% 859 Pts	64-Core 2,120 131% 2,120 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6696) CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2977 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.34 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	116% Outstanding	Lighting 149 Reflection 193 Parallax 200 121% 181 fps	MRender 125 Gravity 184 Splatting 128 118% 146 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 530 304 302 297 295 293 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 1047 Write 1,270 Mixed 442 SusWrite 337 173% 774 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 166 4K Mixed 57.5 211% 85.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1011 DQ Write 856 DQ Mixed 995 729% 954 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 130GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,632 Write 4,231 Mixed 4,280 1,047% 4,714 MB/s	4K Read 546 4K Write 387 4K Mixed 435 1,590% 456 MB/s	DQ Read 1,541 DQ Write 1,130 DQ Mixed 1240 953% 1,304 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB 28,774 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 94GB free Firmware: 05.01A05 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 93 Mixed 64.5 60% 78.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 82%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$40 57,200 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 363GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 75 76 76 76 77 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Read 56.7 Write 44.7 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 75.1 39% 53.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 63%
WD WD80EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB 1,009 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 49 48 48 49 47 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 50% Great: 105%
WD My Book 1140 3TB 6,710 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 3TB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 147 145 144 144 144 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 146 Write 145 Mixed 91.8 SusWrite 144 178% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB 24,517 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 42.1 MC Write 36.1 MC Mixed 37.7 110% 38.6 GB/s	SC Read 24.6 SC Write 22.5 SC Mixed 34.5 78% 27.2 GB/s	Latency 75.6 53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,061

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)