PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7A34 |
Motherboard | MSI B350 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A34) (all builds) |
Memory | 1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170509 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Nov 29 '19 at 20:27 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
68.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Gigabyte(1458 371A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56.6%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 50 50 47 43 46 MB/s
|
62.2%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
663GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 167 174 180 171 179 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 218x |
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples | 109x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 89x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 98x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 68x |
RX 580AMD $140Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 68x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $364 |