HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3396
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime8.6 Days
Run DateNov 29 '19 at 16:42
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-3770-$190
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
65.6% Good
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 202
68% 147 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 524
58% 449 Pts
64-Core 515
35% 515 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2172 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Lighting 127
Reflection 89.5
Parallax 144
33% 120 fps
MRender 96.6
Gravity 124
Splatting 89.8
35% 104 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 395 391 399 399 390 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 457
Mixed 434
SusWrite 398
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 39
124% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 363
274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 135%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB
2TB free, PID 25fa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 27
Write 21.8
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 21.3
31% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
128% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 65%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
4GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 11 15 16 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 16.5
Mixed 14
SusWrite 14.7
23% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.2
135% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 8GBH2X04F1AA28-15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 16.4
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 11.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 67%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 4,187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $250
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $384Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback