Asus P8H67-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M LE  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110711
Uptime11.1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '19 at 16:05
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$195
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 183
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 451
46% 372 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
POV(1ACC 55C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.25% Terrible
Lighting 7.07
Reflection 9.23
Parallax 6.97
6% 7.76 fps
MRender 5.24
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 9.7
7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.25%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370 256GB-$110
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1114H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 141 102 79 100 98 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.6% Average
Read 249
Write 233
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 123
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 6.3
56% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 144
112% 154 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 96%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
377GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 234 236 233 232 232 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.9% Good
Read 248
Write 218
Mixed 188
SusWrite 233
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 32.3
97% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 196
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 117%
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 500GB
390GB free, PID 0b1a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 24
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 28.4
36% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
49.4% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M LE Builds (Compare 531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback