bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
3 months ago, 1 month ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DX79SR
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 29 '19 at 15:32
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-3820-$356
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
63.1% Good
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 194
69% 146 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 495
54% 416 Pts
64-Core 493
33% 493 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$135
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Lighting 128
Reflection 124
Parallax 183
34% 145 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 114
Splatting 80.1
33% 98.4 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 37%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$160
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM03B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 158 160 149 151 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 469
Write 312
Mixed 216
SusWrite 161
64% 290 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 30.2
107% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 120
131% 226 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74%
Great: 110%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$89
252GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 241 238 242 242 242 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
68.8% Good
Read 256
Write 244
Mixed 234
SusWrite 238
55% 243 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 34.8
113% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 197
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 135%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
472GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 136 135 137 137 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 149
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 137
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 0x3136303020434C3920536572696573 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
81% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 28.9
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.4
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 81%
Great: 95%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical bin Builds (Compare 50,455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $398
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $205Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $375Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback