Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics60.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X470 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '19 at 10:44
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Memory 81.5
1-Core 153
2-Core 306
97% 180 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 879
92% 736 Pts
64-Core 1,095
68% 1,095 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.7% Good
Lighting 75.9
Reflection 74.9
Parallax 68.2
62% 73 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 71.5
Splatting 71
58% 71.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$61
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 388 386 395 400 393 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 493
Mixed 341
SusWrite 394
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 48.9
183% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 287
234% 333 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 117%
Great: 119%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
133GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 119 95 88 81 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 498
Write 446
Mixed 206
SusWrite 138
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 37.8
132% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 184
147% 212 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 88%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
127GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,821
Write 7,610
Mixed 7,516
1,710% 7,649 MB/s
4K Read 647
4K Write 344
4K Mixed 422
1,703% 471 MB/s
DQ Read 1,742
DQ Write 1,240
DQ Mixed 1,338
1,041% 1,440 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
366GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 130 132 133 131 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 128
Write 104
Mixed 71
SusWrite 130
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
555GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 78 80 81 79 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 107
Write 77.2
Mixed 49.8
SusWrite 78.8
57% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
467GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 129 129 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 170
Write 131
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 127
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3733 C17 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3734 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 37.6
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 36.2
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 661 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $759
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback