Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 840-$85 1,339 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	61.9% Good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 75.9 2-Core 136 64% 102 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 229 26% 202 Pts	64-Core 234 14% 234 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000M 3,227 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 1521) 2GB CLim: 550 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	5.61% Terrible	Lighting 6.63 Reflection 7.69 Parallax 5.38 5% 6.57 fps	MRender 7.95 Gravity 6.87 Splatting 7.26 6% 7.36 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.61% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900612 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 171 76 76 76 76 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.6% Average	Read 228 Write 151 Mixed 186 SusWrite 112 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 18.4 70% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 138 116% 168 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	40.8% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 13.1 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 10.7 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 62.6 64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
NVS 5100MNvidiaBench 2%, 1,931 samples	305x
Quadro FX 880MNvidiaBench 2%, 4,542 samples	3x
Quadro FX 1800MNvidiaBench 3%, 1,209 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	7x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	5x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16