Apple MacBookPro16,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemApple MacBookPro16,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-E1008331FDC96864
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3072 x 1920 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '19 at 23:06
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
1-Core 128
2-Core 258
90% 193 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 789
83% 647 Pts
64-Core 940
63% 940 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Apple(106B 0210) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.30.03.05
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Lighting 140
Reflection 95.1
Parallax 213
37% 149 fps
MRender 75.8
Gravity 136
Splatting 112
36% 108 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0512 500GB
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7171
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1235 1287 1165 856 906 842 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 62%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 23.3
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 27.6
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84%
Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MacBookPro16,1 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

System: Apple MacBookPro16,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $224
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback