Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemAsus Z9PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory56.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '19 at 20:57
Run Duration313 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
41.6% Average
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 129
46% 97.2 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 396
38% 307 Pts
64-Core 916
62% 916 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$699
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.86
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Lighting 272
Reflection 375
Parallax 571
72% 406 fps
MRender 241
Gravity 487
Splatting 259
126% 329 fps
Poor: 110%
This bench: 123%
Great: 146%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$297
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 371 361 357 378 386 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 423
Write 240
Mixed 388
SusWrite 371
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 27.8
89% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 238
170% 216 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 133%
SABRENT 2TB
841GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1269 848 844 844 850 837 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,241
Write 1,449
Mixed 1,379
SusWrite 915
281% 1,246 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 34.3
123% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 210
184% 277 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 157%
Great: 286%
SABRENT 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1339 923 926 924 910 923 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 1,246
Write 1,734
Mixed 1,334
SusWrite 991
300% 1,326 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 30.7
97% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 166
150% 230 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 152%
Great: 286%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$449
942GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 419 416 415 414 416 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 460
Write 427
Mixed 376
SusWrite 415
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 25.9
84% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 234
175% 229 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$40
599GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 153 165 165 165 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 120
Mixed 31
SusWrite 160
84% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 105%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$40
599GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 145 150 160 159 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 146
Write 140
Mixed 31
SusWrite 152
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 105%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
1TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 146 142 141 146 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 126
Write 101
Mixed 59
SusWrite 143
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2.7
455% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 112%
SABRENT 2TB
591GB free, PID 0583
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 202 201 197 198 196 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
141% Outstanding
Read 254
Write 229
Mixed 222
SusWrite 198
303% 226 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 17.8
1,299% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 21.2
DQ Write 28.2
DQ Mixed 18.8
1,677% 22.7 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 141%
Great: 141%
SANDISK SDDR-489 64GB
59GB free, PID cfc9
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 65 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 88.7
Write 67.8
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 64.9
97% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.2
140% 3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YK 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 31
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.2
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 99%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $789
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $208Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $338Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback