Acer Predator PH317-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAcer Predator PH317-51  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sienna_KLS
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181102
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 28 '19 at 17:24
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 149
66% 106 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 303
43% 310 Pts
64-Core 303
20% 303 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1208) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
4.02% Terrible
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 152
Parallax 14.4
5% 61.5 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 15.7
Splatting 24.7
4% 15.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.02%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1207) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
49.7% Average
Lighting 175
Reflection 191
Parallax 210
46% 192 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 178
Splatting 133
50% 152 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 53%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$147
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 154 225 160 89 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 469
Write 453
Mixed 441
SusWrite 180
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 26.9
95% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 469
DQ Mixed 310
251% 348 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 188%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
287GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 79 73 75 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 122
Write 115
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 77.9
72% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
150% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.2% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 9.8
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Predator PH317-51 Builds (Compare 895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH317-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $147
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $180Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $42
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $548SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback