ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 2325EH2

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 2325EH2 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 2325EH2
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160909
Uptime	3.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 28 '19 at 15:01
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199 30,496 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Memory 48.9 1-Core 84.3 2-Core 137 51% 90.1 Pts	4-Core 177 8-Core 205 25% 191 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 21FA) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.83% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 5.69 Parallax 2.97 3% 4.29 fps	MRender 5.29 Gravity 2.43 Splatting 8.22 5% 5.31 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.83% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMPA128HMFU-000H1 128GB 908 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: AXM18H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 169 169 162 161 160 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 201 Write 182 Mixed 123 SusWrite 165 38% 168 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 28.3 4K Mixed 12.7 47% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 91.7 DQ Write 54 DQ Mixed 21.5 30% 55.7 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 42%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$75 71,106 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 177GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 54 53 74 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	Read 9.7 Write 1.7 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 62.1 18% 24 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 68%
TOSHIBA USB FLASH DRIVE 16GB 970 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 10GB free, PID 1408 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 7.2 6.8 7.2 7.2 6.9 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 72.2 Write 7.5 Mixed 14.5 SusWrite 7.5 24% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 22% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CK0 2x8GB 1,654 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	46.8% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 14.5 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 165 24% 165 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback