| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 60% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Micro-Star MS-7C52 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) (all builds) |
| Memory | 14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191028 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 28 '19 at 14:25 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
80.3%
Excellent
|
78% 139 Pts
|
60% 452 Pts
|
28% 454 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Nvidia(10DE 2187) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
60%
Above average
|
64% 76.8 fps
|
53% 65.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 399 442 450 447 446 MB/s
|
98.3%
Outstanding
|
100% 444 MB/s
|
138% 52.2 MB/s
|
100% 201 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 215 220 220 218 220 MB/s
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
|
97.2%
Outstanding
|
100% 35.1 GB/s
|
85% 29.9 GB/s
|
52% 76.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 2,989 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 437x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 322x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 300x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 221x |
| Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples | 199x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 164x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $303 |