Asrock FM2A75M-HD+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '19 at 07:54
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 750K-$45
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 59.6
2-Core 105
53% 82.1 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 181
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
MSI(1462 2384) 2GB
CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
18% Very poor
Lighting 21
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 18.9
17% 21.5 fps
MRender 27.7
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 22.9
20% 24.1 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 80GB (2007)-$75
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 58.01D58
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 52 53 55 53 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 56.3
Write 64.3
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 52.8
41% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 49%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$32
73GB free
Firmware: 3.CHH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 75 76 78 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 77.5
Write 46.1
Mixed 42.9
SusWrite 76.2
45% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 42%
Disk Name 60GB
54GB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 29 29 30 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 28.4
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 29.4
36% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673EH1-CH9 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36% Below average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 12.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 12.1
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75M-HD+ Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $116
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback