Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Gunboat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 27 '19 at 23:02
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Extreme
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$140 53,083 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	1-Core 122 2-Core 244 86% 183 Pts	4-Core 486 8-Core 951 89% 718 Pts	64-Core 1,390 93% 1,390 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$270 746,202 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Asus(1043 85AB) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.41 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Lighting 231 Reflection 201 Parallax 214 61% 215 fps	MRender 150 Gravity 214 Splatting 169 59% 178 fps
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 61%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$164 7,881 User benchmarks, average bench 269% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVN105 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 2,234 Write 558 Mixed 623 246% 1,138 MB/s	4K Read 43.8 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 54.4 204% 75.4 MB/s	DQ Read 604 DQ Write 498 DQ Mixed 501 389% 534 MB/s
Poor: 165% Great: 352%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$89 450,220 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 203GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 439 440 443 419 356 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 438 Mixed 402 SusWrite 422 98% 438 MB/s	4K Read 38.3 4K Write 71.4 4K Mixed 48.4 158% 52.7 MB/s	DQ Read 239 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 206 155% 208 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 135%
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$100 7,551 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 145GB free Firmware: Q0922FS SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 410 408 412 411 411 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Read 499 Write 404 Mixed 386 SusWrite 410 95% 425 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 63.5 4K Mixed 31.3 112% 40 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 75.6 DQ Mixed 78.6 63% 88.2 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 127%
WD WD10S21X-24R1BT0-SSHD-8GB 1TB 11,282 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 369GB free Firmware: 03.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 87 88 88 89 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Read 74.7 Write 88.7 Mixed 48.9 SusWrite 81.5 54% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 58%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 250GB-$29 5,941 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 220GB free Firmware: GM2OA52A Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 88.9 Write 88.6 Mixed 50 56% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 51%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$39 182,664 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free Firmware: AX001U SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 13 12 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 43.7 Write 8.2 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 12.3 14% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 65% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot 3000 C16 Series 2x8GB 1,759 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3133 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 42.8 MC Write 38.2 MC Mixed 32.4 108% 37.8 GB/s	SC Read 26.5 SC Write 40.7 SC Mixed 29.2 92% 32.1 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 107%

UFO

Desktop 132%

UFO

Workstation 118%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $320Bench 93%, 85,910 samples	1,366x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $185Bench 88%, 127,172 samples	760x
Ryzen 5 3600XAMD $224Bench 92%, 37,779 samples	447x

GPU
RX 5700-XTAMD $410Bench 106%, 59,311 samples	443x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $500Bench 112%, 65,398 samples	355x
GTX 1070Nvidia $346Bench 79%, 705,740 samples	232x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $110Bench 291%, 71,528 samples	238x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $160Bench 308%, 60,920 samples	124x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $88Bench 274%, 141,877 samples	122x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $80Bench 86%, 178,898 samples	251x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $153Bench 89%, 26,365 samples	111x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $88Bench 84%, 51,129 samples	105x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $920

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $205	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240	Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $150	Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $375	Nvidia RTX 2060 $349	Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14