Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '19 at 23:02
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$277
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 90.1
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
87% 152 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 951
89% 718 Pts
64-Core 1,390
93% 1,390 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$290
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
60.1% Good
Lighting 76.9
Reflection 77.4
Parallax 67
62% 73.8 fps
MRender 71.3
Gravity 71.4
Splatting 73.6
58% 72.1 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 62%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$164
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN105 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2,234
Write 558
Mixed 623
246% 1,138 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 54.4
204% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 604
DQ Write 498
DQ Mixed 501
389% 534 MB/s
Poor: 143% Great: 337%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$125
203GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 439 440 443 419 356 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 438
Mixed 402
SusWrite 422
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 48.4
158% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 206
155% 208 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 104%
Great: 134%
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$100
145GB free
Firmware: Q0922FS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 410 408 412 411 411 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 499
Write 404
Mixed 386
SusWrite 410
95% 425 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 31.3
112% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 75.6
DQ Mixed 78.6
63% 88.2 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 125%
WD WD10S21X-24R1BT0-SSHD-8GB 1TB
369GB free
Firmware: 03.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 87 88 88 89 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 74.7
Write 88.7
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 81.5
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 59%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 250GB-$44
220GB free
Firmware: GM2OA52A
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 88.9
Write 88.6
Mixed 50
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 51%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$46
931GB free
Firmware: AX001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 13 12 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 43.7
Write 8.2
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 12.3
14% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
65% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Patriot 3000 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 32.4
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 40.7
SC Mixed 29.2
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 105%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 16,578 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,157
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback