Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4105 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 36% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Memory 41.8 1-Core 53.6 2-Core 104 38% 66.5 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 208 28% 209 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.56% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 3.54 Parallax 2.34 2% 2.75 fps	MRender 4.52 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 6.3 4% 4.41 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.56% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB 7,332 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0628A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 97 43 43 54 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 396 Write 306 Mixed 283 SusWrite 108 61% 273 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 70.4 4K Mixed 1 50% 26.4 MB/s	DQ Read 89.6 DQ Write 46.2 DQ Mixed 17.2 26% 51 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	27% Poor	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 11.2 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.47 GB/s	Latency 194 21% 194 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4105IntelBench 36%, 1,216 samples	9x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	9x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	7x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16