MSI 770-C45 (MS-7599)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7599
MotherboardMSI 770-C45 (MS-7599)  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '19 at 22:59
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Phenom II X4 945
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
37.9% Below average
1-Core 55
2-Core 110
39% 82.3 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 215
30% 218 Pts
64-Core 219
15% 219 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8572) 2GB
CLim: 836 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.20
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.39% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 10.9
2% 8.8 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 10
2% 8.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.39%
Great: 4%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$80
555GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ100E4
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,586
Write 30.9
Mixed 58
401% 558 MB/s
4K Read 293
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
12,349% 98.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 76%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBRL0 F3-10666CL9-4GBRL0 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
32% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 11.8
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32%
Great: 42%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 770-C45 (MS-7599) Builds (Compare 1,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 770-C45 (MS-7599)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $168
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback