Gigabyte GA-MA785GMT-UD2H

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	21.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MA785GMT-UD2H (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090806
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '19 at 15:38
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	59% Above average	Memory 88 1-Core 45.9 2-Core 95.8 51% 76.6 Pts	4-Core 176 8-Core 182 24% 178 Pts	64-Core 178 11% 178 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 3635) 3GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	21.9% Poor	Lighting 25.6 Reflection 23.7 Parallax 31.2 21% 26.8 fps	MRender 33.5 Gravity 31 Splatting 25.2 24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: R010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 80 45 51 55 25 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.1% Below average	Read 162 Write 159 Mixed 182 SusWrite 49.6 31% 138 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 34.3 4K Mixed 21.5 78% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 42 55% 98.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 100%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 428GB free Firmware: MX6O SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 80 45 51 55 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Read 19.9 Write 89.7 Mixed 21.1 SusWrite 49.7 33% 45.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 106% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 12.9 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 9.5 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-MA785GMT-UD2H Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA785GMT-UD2H

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	15x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	14x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	12x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	11x
R9 380AMD $200Bench 33%, 83,027 samples	6x
Radeon R5 220AMDBench 1%, 1,709 samples	5x

SSD
Prime Series 256GBGigastoneBench 61%, 167 samples	8x
120GB SSD 120GBLexarBench 66%, 960 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	22x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	15x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $175

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16