HP Z220 CMT Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Z220 CMT Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1790
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180613
Uptime	12 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '19 at 08:06
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770S-$95 10,699 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 82.2 1-Core 107 2-Core 198 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 321 8-Core 482 50% 401 Pts	64-Core 493 30% 493 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 300 2,463 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 0862) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.35 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.12% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 2.38 Parallax 0.44 1% 1.31 fps	MRender 3.24 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.78 2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.12% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 20 66 37 78 18 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.7% Poor	Read 238 Write 88 Mixed 45.8 SusWrite 49.7 23% 105 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 13.3 4K Mixed 7.9 32% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 10.4 DQ Write 11.7 DQ Mixed 10.5 8% 10.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 85%
Hitachi HTS542512K9SA00 120GB-$25 1,782 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 103GB free Firmware: BB2OC31P SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 53 55 55 55 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Read 54.4 Write 53.3 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 54.5 35% 47.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 31%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40 13,720 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 290GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 101 106 106 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 106 Write 105 Mixed 68.8 SusWrite 105 71% 96.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT25664BA1339.C8FE Hynix HMT325U7CFR8C-PB 859B CT25664BA1339.C8FE Hynix HMT325U7CFR8C-PB 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.9% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 14.5 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 16.6 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z220 CMT Workstation Builds (Compare 1,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: HP Z220 CMT Workstation

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	615x
Xeon E3-1225 V2Intel $200Bench 70%, 2,869 samples	158x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	107x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	101x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	71x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	71x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	42x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,354 samples	33x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 4x4GBMicronBench 55%, 1,512 samples	25x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16