Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE II  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '19 at 21:39
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 88.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 228
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 795
74% 614 Pts
64-Core 1,189
74% 1,189 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 150
Parallax 138
113% 142 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 135
Splatting 109
97% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
231GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 278 250 217 137 156 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 450
Mixed 412
SusWrite 214
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 56
185% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 357
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
140GB free
Firmware: BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 275 244 274 276 278 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 296
Mixed 331
SusWrite 266
76% 343 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 53.6
178% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 233
208% 315 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 107%
Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
170GB free
Firmware: BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 38 34 40 40 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: ABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 192 174 191 192 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 175
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 185
104% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
1TB free
Firmware: 0K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 102 94 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 107
Write 99
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 98.8
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 76%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 50a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 117 109 119 118 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 114
Write 104
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 116
120% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 46.6
MC Write 48.6
MC Mixed 41.3
130% 45.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 115%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 847 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,076
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback